Lumeitalia

Caricamento

Il caricamento sta impiegando più tempo del previsto.

Torna alla home

Lumeitalia

The technical desk answers: retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations

Questions and answers with the Centro Studi Lumeitalia technical desk on retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations.

Studio illuminotecnico con planimetria, ottiche e simulazione della luce
Studio illuminotecnico con planimetria, ottiche e simulazione della luce. Immagine illustrativa generata con AI.

Overview

The format of this piece is an internal technical conversation: the questions are those most often received by Centro Studi Lumeitalia from designers, technical offices and installers; the answers are drafted by the technical desk and validated by the R&D engineering office. Most projects do not start from scratch: they work on existing installations, with poles, lines and constraints already in place.

Applicable standards

The regulatory reference for retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations is not a single document but a coordinated set of standards covering performance, safety and environmental impact. In design practice the following documents drive the main choices.

  • EN 13201 / EN 12464 — performance requirements to be met.
  • IEC 60364 — verification of the existing electrical installation.
  • Italian CAM for lighting — constraints in public projects.

Where does a project like this start?

You always start from the requirements, never from the product. When the luminaire is chosen before the performance class is defined, the design becomes an after-the-fact justification and problems surface at commissioning.

The recurring critical points we see in this field are well known: assessing the real condition of poles, lines and boards before replacing luminaires; avoiding energy savings that mask a failure to meet standards; scheduling works to reduce disruption for residents and users. These are method problems before component problems, which is why they are solved at the design set-up stage.

What is the most common mistake?

Assuming the calculated result stays unchanged over time. The maintenance factor is not a box to tick to complete the report: it embodies the assumed management of the installation. If the planned cleaning cycle is not respected, the installation drops below requirements even if the design was correct.

One practical tip for designers?

Document the assumptions as carefully as the results. In our daily work the approach that gives the most stable outcomes is this: detailed asset survey with a record per light point and structural checks on supports, a lighting design proving compliance with the required classes and functional lots by homogeneous area with progressive commissioning. These three choices cost little at design stage and a great deal if postponed.

Recurring critical points

The difficulties that most often emerge in retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations projects are not about product selection, but about defining requirements and verifying results.

  • Assessing the real condition of poles, lines and boards before replacing luminaires.
  • Avoiding energy savings that mask a failure to meet standards.
  • Scheduling works to reduce disruption for residents and users.

Design approach

An orderly method drastically reduces variations during works and disputes at commissioning. Three choices make the difference from the earliest stages.

  • Detailed asset survey with a record per light point and structural checks on supports.
  • A lighting design proving compliance with the required classes.
  • Functional lots by homogeneous area with progressive commissioning.

Parameters to verify

  • Asset survey — good practice — record per light point
  • Compliance check — EN 13201 / 12464 — classes and requirements achieved
  • Electrical condition — IEC 60364 — boards, protection, leakage
  • CAM requirements — Italian CAM — mandatory in public works

Most frequent mistakes

Non-conformities found at commissioning almost always come from three causes: requirements not declared or declared without a reference standard, calculation run on idealised geometry, and an optimistic maintenance factor. All three can be avoided at zero cost during design.

Key takeaways

A retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations project holds up over time when requirements are declared, the calculation reproduces real conditions and on-site verification follows an agreed protocol. Component selection matters, but comes later: without measurable requirements even the best product delivers a result that cannot be demonstrated. Centro Studi Lumeitalia makes its technical office available to review requirements and design checks.

Methodological note: This content is written for technical information purposes by Centro Studi Lumeitalia and does not replace the lighting design or a full reading of the standards cited. Applicable performance values are those of the standards in force at design time.

Domande frequenti

Is a retrofit enough to be compliant?+

No: replacing the luminaire improves efficiency, but compliance depends on the overall lighting result, verified by calculation.

When should poles be replaced too?+

When structural checks reveal corrosion, or when the existing geometry cannot achieve the required class.

Where should a retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations project start?+

From a written definition of performance requirements and verification conditions: this step drives every later choice and makes the result either disputable or defensible at commissioning.

Which documents should be requested from the supplier?+

Photometric files of the proposed luminaires, declaration of conformity, lifetime data declared per IES LM-80 with its conditions, the maintenance schedule and warranty terms.