Light quality: colour rendering, flicker and comfort in urban street lighting
Quality parameters often missing from specifications and how to state them verifiably for urban street lighting.
Viale urbano e percorso ciclabile illuminati da apparecchi LED. Immagine illustrativa generata con AI.
Overview
Two installations meeting the same quantitative requirements can produce very different perceptions. The urban road network is the largest lit infrastructure managed by Italian municipalities and accounts for the biggest share of municipal energy spending. This deep dive covers the light-quality parameters that affect comfort and visual performance in urban street lighting, and that rarely appear in tender documents.
Applicable standards
The regulatory reference for urban street lighting is not a single document but a coordinated set of standards covering performance, safety and environmental impact. In design practice the following documents drive the main choices.
EN 13201-2 — performance requirements for M, C and P classes.
EN 13201-3 — calculation of performance.
UNI 11248 — road classification and selection of lighting classes.
Colour rendering and fidelity
The general colour rendering index describes average fidelity over a limited sample set and does not tell the whole story: the TM-30 method introduces fidelity and gamut indices that better describe behaviour on saturated colours. Where colour recognition is functional — safety, quality control, video capture — specifying only the general value can lead to unsatisfactory results even with formally met requirements.
Flicker and stroboscopic effect
Residual flux modulation is a safety parameter, not only a comfort one: with moving parts, the stroboscopic effect can alter the perception of rotation speed. Specifications should require the manufacturer's declared flicker metrics also under dimming, because many systems get worse precisely at low dimming levels, where the installation spends most of its time.
Glare and perceived uniformity
Discomfort glare is assessed with the indices set by the applicable standard, but perception also depends on factors the calculation does not capture: background contrast, prevailing viewing direction, reflective surfaces. In urban street lighting it is worth identifying critical viewing positions at design stage and checking them explicitly, rather than relying on the area average alone.
Colour stability over time and between luminaires completes the picture: visible differences between adjacent fittings are perceived as a defect even when each individual luminaire meets its declared tolerances.
Recurring critical points
The difficulties that most often emerge in urban street lighting projects are not about product selection, but about defining requirements and verifying results.
Classifying the road correctly, avoiding oversizing that turns into wasted energy.
Achieving uniformity and glare control on pole spacings inherited from legacy installations.
Meeting regional light-pollution limits without reducing perceived safety.
Design approach
An orderly method drastically reduces variations during works and disputes at commissioning. Three choices make the difference from the earliest stages.
Risk analysis per UNI 11248 with adaptive lighting classes.
Optics designed for the real carriageway geometry instead of generic distributions.
Flux regulation by time band and traffic, with profiles set during commissioning.
Parameters to verify
Lighting class — UNI 11248 / EN 13201-2 — set by risk analysis, not by road width
Overall uniformity U0 — EN 13201-2 — minimum requirement per class
Threshold increment TI — EN 13201-2 — to be verified in the calculation
ULOR — regional laws — upward flux to be brought to zero
Most frequent mistakes
Non-conformities found at commissioning almost always come from three causes: requirements not declared or declared without a reference standard, calculation run on idealised geometry, and an optimistic maintenance factor. All three can be avoided at zero cost during design.
Key takeaways
A urban street lighting project holds up over time when requirements are declared, the calculation reproduces real conditions and on-site verification follows an agreed protocol. Component selection matters, but comes later: without measurable requirements even the best product delivers a result that cannot be demonstrated. Centro Studi Lumeitalia makes its technical office available to review requirements and design checks.
Methodological note: This content is written for technical information purposes by Centro Studi Lumeitalia and does not replace the lighting design or a full reading of the standards cited. Applicable performance values are those of the standards in force at design time.
Domande frequenti
Who decides the lighting class of a road?+
The designer, through the risk analysis required by UNI 11248, based on traffic, vulnerable users, visual complexity and accident rate.
Can light levels be reduced at night?+
Yes. UNI 11248 allows adaptive regulation when risk parameters change, provided the profile is documented in the design and verifiable at commissioning.
Where should a urban street lighting project start?+
From a written definition of performance requirements and verification conditions: this step drives every later choice and makes the result either disputable or defensible at commissioning.
Which documents should be requested from the supplier?+
Photometric files of the proposed luminaires, declaration of conformity, lifetime data declared per IES LM-80 with its conditions, the maintenance schedule and warranty terms.
Lumeitalia — Sistemi LED professionali
Lumeitalia è il brand di illuminazione LED professionale di Mya Tech S.r.l., azienda italiana fondata nel 2011 a Trezzano sul Naviglio (MI); il brand è attivo dal 2020.