Lumeitalia

Caricamento

Il caricamento sta impiegando più tempo del previsto.

Torna alla home

Lumeitalia

Light quality: colour rendering, flicker and comfort in retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations

Quality parameters often missing from specifications and how to state them verifiably for retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations.

Studio illuminotecnico con planimetria, ottiche e simulazione della luce
Studio illuminotecnico con planimetria, ottiche e simulazione della luce. Immagine illustrativa generata con AI.

Overview

Two installations meeting the same quantitative requirements can produce very different perceptions. Most projects do not start from scratch: they work on existing installations, with poles, lines and constraints already in place. This deep dive covers the light-quality parameters that affect comfort and visual performance in retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations, and that rarely appear in tender documents.

Applicable standards

The regulatory reference for retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations is not a single document but a coordinated set of standards covering performance, safety and environmental impact. In design practice the following documents drive the main choices.

  • EN 13201 / EN 12464 — performance requirements to be met.
  • IEC 60364 — verification of the existing electrical installation.
  • Italian CAM for lighting — constraints in public projects.

Colour rendering and fidelity

The general colour rendering index describes average fidelity over a limited sample set and does not tell the whole story: the TM-30 method introduces fidelity and gamut indices that better describe behaviour on saturated colours. Where colour recognition is functional — safety, quality control, video capture — specifying only the general value can lead to unsatisfactory results even with formally met requirements.

Flicker and stroboscopic effect

Residual flux modulation is a safety parameter, not only a comfort one: with moving parts, the stroboscopic effect can alter the perception of rotation speed. Specifications should require the manufacturer's declared flicker metrics also under dimming, because many systems get worse precisely at low dimming levels, where the installation spends most of its time.

Glare and perceived uniformity

Discomfort glare is assessed with the indices set by the applicable standard, but perception also depends on factors the calculation does not capture: background contrast, prevailing viewing direction, reflective surfaces. In retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations it is worth identifying critical viewing positions at design stage and checking them explicitly, rather than relying on the area average alone.

Colour stability over time and between luminaires completes the picture: visible differences between adjacent fittings are perceived as a defect even when each individual luminaire meets its declared tolerances.

Recurring critical points

The difficulties that most often emerge in retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations projects are not about product selection, but about defining requirements and verifying results.

  • Assessing the real condition of poles, lines and boards before replacing luminaires.
  • Avoiding energy savings that mask a failure to meet standards.
  • Scheduling works to reduce disruption for residents and users.

Design approach

An orderly method drastically reduces variations during works and disputes at commissioning. Three choices make the difference from the earliest stages.

  • Detailed asset survey with a record per light point and structural checks on supports.
  • A lighting design proving compliance with the required classes.
  • Functional lots by homogeneous area with progressive commissioning.

Parameters to verify

  • Asset survey — good practice — record per light point
  • Compliance check — EN 13201 / 12464 — classes and requirements achieved
  • Electrical condition — IEC 60364 — boards, protection, leakage
  • CAM requirements — Italian CAM — mandatory in public works

Most frequent mistakes

Non-conformities found at commissioning almost always come from three causes: requirements not declared or declared without a reference standard, calculation run on idealised geometry, and an optimistic maintenance factor. All three can be avoided at zero cost during design.

Key takeaways

A retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations project holds up over time when requirements are declared, the calculation reproduces real conditions and on-site verification follows an agreed protocol. Component selection matters, but comes later: without measurable requirements even the best product delivers a result that cannot be demonstrated. Centro Studi Lumeitalia makes its technical office available to review requirements and design checks.

Methodological note: This content is written for technical information purposes by Centro Studi Lumeitalia and does not replace the lighting design or a full reading of the standards cited. Applicable performance values are those of the standards in force at design time.

Domande frequenti

Is a retrofit enough to be compliant?+

No: replacing the luminaire improves efficiency, but compliance depends on the overall lighting result, verified by calculation.

When should poles be replaced too?+

When structural checks reveal corrosion, or when the existing geometry cannot achieve the required class.

Where should a retrofit and refurbishment of existing installations project start?+

From a written definition of performance requirements and verification conditions: this step drives every later choice and makes the result either disputable or defensible at commissioning.

Which documents should be requested from the supplier?+

Photometric files of the proposed luminaires, declaration of conformity, lifetime data declared per IES LM-80 with its conditions, the maintenance schedule and warranty terms.